✨ Summarize
Waiting for action...
Public corruption investigations move quietly and build slowly before anyone is charged. By the time a public official, government contractor, or politically connected individual learns they are a target, federal agents and prosecutors have often been building a case for months. If you have received a subpoena, a target letter, or a visit from the FBI, the time to act is now, not after charges are filed.
Flanary Law represents individuals and organizations facing public corruption investigations and charges in San Antonio, throughout Texas, and in federal court. Call us now at (210) 738-8383 to speak with a public corruption defense attorney today.
Public corruption broadly refers to the abuse of a public position or governmental authority for private gain. It encompasses a wide range of conduct involving public officials, government employees, contractors, lobbyists, and private individuals who interact with the government. Federal law treats public corruption as one of the most serious categories of criminal conduct, and both the FBI and the Department of Justice maintain dedicated units focused exclusively on prosecuting it.
Federal bribery of public officials under 18 U.S.C. § 201 prohibits offering, giving, soliciting, or receiving anything of value to influence an official act. Kickback schemes in government contracting, procurement, and licensing are prosecuted under both federal bribery statutes and 18 U.S.C. § 666, which covers theft and bribery involving programs that receive federal funds.
Texas Penal Code Chapter 36 governs bribery at the state level, covering public servants, party officials, and voters.
Honest services fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1346 criminalizes schemes to deprive citizens and employers of the intangible right to honest services. In the public corruption context, this typically involves undisclosed conflicts of interest, secret self-dealing by public officials, and concealed financial relationships between officials and those seeking government action.
Honest services fraud is frequently charged alongside wire fraud and mail fraud, significantly increasing the exposure of the accused.
Extortion under color of official right occurs when a public official uses their position to obtain payments or benefits in exchange for official acts, even without explicit threats. The Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951, is the primary federal statute governing this conduct, and it has been applied to elected officials, law enforcement officers, licensing authorities, and regulatory personnel.
Misappropriation of public funds, diversion of government resources for personal use, and fraudulent expenditure of public money can give rise to charges under multiple federal and state statutes depending on the nature of the funds and the official’s role. These cases frequently involve parallel civil forfeiture proceedings alongside the criminal prosecution.
Election fraud, vote buying, campaign finance violations, and corrupt interference with electoral processes fall within the public corruption umbrella. These cases are pursued by both federal prosecutors and state attorneys general, and they attract significant media attention that can affect a defendant’s reputation before any facts are adjudicated.
Bid rigging, collusion in public procurement, and corrupt issuance of permits, licenses, or regulatory approvals are common subjects of public corruption investigation. Private contractors and business owners who pay bribes to obtain government contracts face the same federal exposure as the officials who receive them.
The FBI’s Public Corruption unit is the primary federal investigative body for public corruption matters and describes corruption as the FBI’s top criminal priority.
The Department of Justice Public Integrity Section prosecutes elected and appointed officials at the federal, state, and local levels.
The IRS Criminal Investigation Division frequently participates in corruption investigations where unreported income or financial concealment is involved.
At the state level, the Texas Rangers, the Texas Attorney General’s Office, and local district attorneys investigate public corruption under Texas law. Multi-agency task forces combining federal and state investigators are common in complex cases.
No. Public corruption can be charged under Texas law, federal law, or both simultaneously. Federal prosecution is more common when federal funds are involved, when the conduct crosses state lines, or when federal agencies conducted the investigation. State prosecution is more common for local officials, state-level misconduct, and cases where a federal nexus is absent. Dual prosecution, while subject to constitutional limitations, does occur in serious cases, and defendants must be prepared to address both simultaneously.
Public corruption charges are not limited to elected officials. The full range of individuals who may face investigation and charges includes:
If you had any financial relationship with a government official or entity that is now under investigation, you may be a subject or target regardless of your own government role or lack thereof.
Federal public corruption convictions carry severe penalties that reflect the government’s view of these offenses as fundamental betrayals of public trust:
Because public corruption cases frequently involve multiple counts across multiple statutes, total sentencing exposure can reach decades even in cases involving relatively modest financial amounts. Forfeiture of proceeds, substantial fines, restitution, and permanent disqualification from public office are also common components of federal public corruption sentences.
Public corruption cases differ from other white collar crime prosecutions in several important ways. The investigations are typically conducted over extended periods, often a year or more, before any charges are filed. Federal prosecutors enter these cases with substantial evidence already assembled, and cooperating witnesses who have agreed to testify in exchange for leniency are a standard feature of the prosecution’s strategy.
The political and media dimensions of public corruption cases create reputational exposure that can be as damaging as the legal consequences. Press releases accompany federal indictments, media coverage begins at arrest, and managing the public narrative alongside the legal defense requires an attorney with specific experience in high-profile federal matters.
These cases also frequently involve money laundering, embezzlement, tax fraud, and felony charges stacked alongside the primary corruption counts, requiring defense counsel who can address the full scope of the government’s theory simultaneously.
A federal target letter is the Department of Justice’s formal notification that you are a target of a grand jury investigation. Receiving one means federal prosecutors have identified you as a likely defendant and are building toward an indictment.
A grand jury subpoena means you have been called to testify or produce documents in a federal investigation.
A visit or call from an FBI agent means investigators want to speak with you, and anything you say can and will be used against you.
In all three situations, the single most important action is to retain an experienced federal criminal lawyer for white collar cases before responding in any way.
Do not speak to investigators without counsel present. Do not produce documents without legal review. Do not discuss the matter with colleagues, friends, or family members who could become witnesses. Early legal intervention can affect the trajectory of an investigation before charges are ever filed. Call Flanary Law immediately and get ahead of the oncoming legal flood.
Flanary Law approaches public corruption cases with the strategic depth and federal court experience these matters demand. Defense begins well before indictment when possible, with early engagement with the government to understand the scope of the investigation, assess cooperation opportunities, and in some cases prevent charges from being filed.
When charges are filed, the defense strategy focuses on challenging the government’s legal theories, contesting the characterization of payments or benefits as corrupt, examining the credibility and motivations of cooperating witnesses, challenging the admissibility of evidence obtained through surveillance or wiretaps, and presenting the full factual context of the conduct at issue. As a team of San Antonio criminal defense lawyer with experience in federal court, Flanary Law understands the Western District of Texas, the federal prosecutors who handle these cases in San Antonio, and the defense approaches that produce results in this jurisdiction.
If you are under investigation, have received a subpoena or target letter, or have been contacted by federal agents in connection with a public corruption matter, do not wait to get legal counsel involved. Contact Flanary Law at (210) 738-8383 today to speak with a San Antonio public corruption defense attorney.
